Which scenario does NOT require a mandatory waveoff?

Which scenario does NOT require a mandatory waveoff?

• A. If landing gear is not properly deployed
• B. If more than 30° AOB is used to get established on final
• C. If the runway is occupied
• D. If visibility is below minimums

Answer: (B)

In the context of flight training and standard operating procedures, a mandatory waveoff is required in situations that could compromise safety during landing. The scenario regarding the use of more than 30° of bank angle (AOB) to get established on final does not inherently create a situation that necessitates a waveoff. While excessive bank angles can be a result of poor positioning and could lead to an unstable approach, simply using more than 30° AOB alone is not a definitive indicator of an unsafe situation requiring immediate waveoff. Context matters, and if the pilot can still safely align with the runway, a waveoff isn't automatically mandated. In contrast, scenarios involving improperly deployed landing gear, runway occupancy, or visibility below minimums present clear safety risks that directly warrant a waveoff to ensure the safety of the aircraft and those on the ground. These situations involve immediate concerns that could lead to significant consequences during the landing phase, thus mandating an abort of the landing attempt to reassess and establish a safer approach.

In the context of flight training and standard operating procedures, a mandatory waveoff is required in situations that could compromise safety during landing. The scenario regarding the use of more than 30° of bank angle (AOB) to get established on final does not inherently create a situation that necessitates a waveoff. While excessive bank angles can be a result of poor positioning and could lead to an unstable approach, simply using more than 30° AOB alone is not a definitive indicator of an unsafe situation requiring immediate waveoff. Context matters, and if the pilot can still safely align with the runway, a waveoff isn't automatically mandated.

In contrast, scenarios involving improperly deployed landing gear, runway occupancy, or visibility below minimums present clear safety risks that directly warrant a waveoff to ensure the safety of the aircraft and those on the ground. These situations involve immediate concerns that could lead to significant consequences during the landing phase, thus mandating an abort of the landing attempt to reassess and establish a safer approach.